
From the perspective of fabricators and construction teams, efficient structural steel design plays a major role in controlling cost, schedule, and constructability, all key concerns for owners as well. When these considerations are not addressed early, inefficiencies often surface later in fabrication and erection, leading to increased labor, coordination challenges, and avoidable schedule impacts. Designs that emphasize simplicity and repeatability help streamline fabrication, reduce field labor, and minimize risk during erection.
Below are several design considerations that consistently lead to more economical and buildable steel structures. These considerations generally fall into a few recurring themes related to framing layout, connection strategy, and constructability in the field.
Framing Layout and Member Selection
- Simplicity Leads to Savings
Straightforward framing systems are faster and more cost-effective to fabricate and erect. Repetition in bay spacing, member sizes, and connection details improves shop efficiency and allows steel to be ordered in bulk, reducing both material and labor costs. - Lowest Weight Does Not Always Mean Lowest Cost
Labor, especially field labor, often represents the largest portion of a structural steel package. In many cases, slightly heavier members can improve constructability, simplify connections, and reduce erection time, resulting in lower total costs. - Larger Columns Often Perform Better
Columns with larger dimensions are typically more efficient and allow for simpler beam connections. Smaller, slender columns often require heavier sections and additional coping and member reinforcement, which can increase fabrication complexity and cost.
Connection details are often where small decisions have an outsized impact on shop efficiency and field labor.
Connection Strategy and Fabrication Efficiency
- Use Standard Connections Whenever Possible
Typical connection types can be efficiently fabricated using CNC equipment with minimal manual labor. Skewed or custom connections often require additional shop time and field adjustments, increasing overall project costs. - Avoid Skewed Column-to-Beam Geometry
Orienting columns so beams and girders frame in at 90 degrees allows for standard, CNC-fabricated connections. Skewed connections generally increase fabrication time and field labor.
These design choices also show up during erection, where access and welding conditions can influence installation time.
Constructability and Erection Considerations
- Design Connections for Flat Welding Positions
Connections that allow welding in flat positions are significantly faster to install in the field. Overhead welding is labor-intensive and time-consuming, so minimizing these conditions can lead to meaningful savings during erection. - Brace Frame Angles Matter
Brace frames are most efficient when members are near a 45-degree angle. Keeping brace slopes between approximately 35 and 55 degrees improves structural efficiency while simplifying fabrication and installation.
Implications for Project Teams
Taken together, these considerations highlight how early structural decisions can influence more than just member sizing. Thoughtful steel layout and connection strategies can reduce fabrication complexity, shorten erection durations, and limit the need for field adjustments. When structural design aligns with fabrication and construction workflows, projects are better positioned to control costs, maintain schedules, and reduce coordination risk.
Conclusion
Economical steel design is not solely about minimizing tonnage. It is about understanding how design choices translate into real-world fabrication and construction efforts. By prioritizing simplicity, standardization, and constructability, structural steel systems can be delivered more efficiently while still meeting performance and design goals. This approach supports smoother project execution and creates value for owners, contractors, and project teams alike.
other articles

Understanding when a geotechnical investigation is required can help project teams make more informed decisions early in design. This article outlines key code considerations, site conditions, and coordination steps that influence foundation design, while highlighting how early collaboration can reduce risk, avoid overly conservative assumptions, and support more efficient project outcomes.

We’re celebrating 15 years of engineering excellence, collaboration, and growth. This milestone wouldn’t be possible without our incredible clients and dedicated team who’ve shaped our journey from day one. Read more as we reflect on our achievements and look toward the next chapter.

This article breaks down how the AISC Code of Standard Practice (CoSP) clarifies the roles of the Engineer of Record, Steel Detailer, and Connection Engineer in connection design. It outlines the three primary design options, explains key provisions that ensure clarity and accountability, and highlights how consistent communication leads to safer, more efficient projects.